<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Timelines - Latest Comments</title><link>http://timelines.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://timelines.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:15:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Changes</title><link>http://timelined.blogspot.com/2008/07/changes.html#comment-876704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes,I like it too.It's that mixture of 2D, 3D and simple segmented cut out figure animation is an eclectic combination.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emsquared</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes</title><link>http://timelined.blogspot.com/2008/07/changes.html#comment-874831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like that animation style.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jer@nyquil.org</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:06:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public Information Films</title><link>http://timelined.blogspot.com/2008/06/public-information-films.html#comment-707948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks RB- There is more than one way of viewing some of the timelines (timeline, list view, flipbook on the top left of the timeline window) though admit that one was made quickly from a keyword rather than inputting in one at a time so it'd only show when it was submitted to You Tube.Yes iIm pleased with the look though it took longer to sort the comments system out than usual.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emsquared</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:48:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public Information Films</title><link>http://timelined.blogspot.com/2008/06/public-information-films.html#comment-707880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just loved that Pedestrian Crossing film - superb!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't actually get along with the timeline way of presenting information but that is just me and my funny brain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suppose for the public info film one it would have been helpful from my point of view to have them arranged by date that they were produced - so 1948 in that case so I didn't have to click on something to find that out. I was unclear what the date on the timeline actually related to?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I thought that the one about your blog was interesting - seeing all the posts scattered in that way. But it makes my head ache in a way that it would not if I saw them listed sequentially one under the other or arranged nicely in categories.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I am going to stick with this and see if I can get to grips with that way of thinking if I try it often enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The new blog is very easy on the eye- I like it a lot! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reluctant Blogger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>